
Opinion / Politics
John Fetterman’s Shift from Progressive Firebrand to Bipartisan Maverick
John Fetterman’s journey from progressive firebrand to the Senate’s most bipartisan Democrat has stunned allies and foes alike, marked by his embrace of Trump’s policies and a hard pivot on issues like immigration and Israel. Is this a genuine change of heart or a strategic play for reelection in a shifting Pennsylvania?

Tommy Flynn
July 26, 2025 - When John Fetterman was elected to the U.S. Senate from Pennsylvania in November 2022, he was a progressive icon. The 6-foot-8, tattooed former mayor of Braddock, known for his hoodies and blunt rhetoric, had campaigned on a platform echoing Bernie Sanders’ democratic socialism. He championed income inequality solutions, marijuana legalization, and a robust social safety net, earning endorsements from the left wing of the Democratic Party. His victory over Republican Mehmet Oz, despite a near-fatal stroke in May 2022, solidified his image as a resilient, working-class advocate who flipped a critical Senate seat. Yet, less than three years later, Fetterman has emerged as the Senate’s most bipartisan Democrat, collaborating with President Donald Trump and drawing ire from his former progressive allies. This transformation raises questions about his motivations—genuine evolution or political pragmatism in a purple state?
Fetterman’s early Senate tenure was marred by health challenges. His stroke left him with auditory processing issues, requiring closed-captioning accommodations in the Senate. In February 2023, he checked into Walter Reed National Military Medical Center for six weeks to treat clinical depression, a move praised for destigmatizing mental health struggles. Returning in April 2023, he resumed duties with a lighter schedule, co-sponsoring bipartisan legislation like a rail safety bill after the East Palestine, Ohio, train derailment. His focus remained progressive, emphasizing food security and criminal justice reform, but cracks in his ideology began to appear.
By late 2023, Fetterman’s staunch support for Israel following the October 7 Hamas attack marked a significant shift. Unlike progressive colleagues urging restraint, he defended Israel’s actions in Gaza, calling critics “fringe” and opposing the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement. This stance alienated his left-wing base, who once lauded his authenticity. His rhetoric also hardened on immigration. Previously self-described as the Senate’s “most pro-immigration member,” Fetterman called for a “reset” on border policy in December 2023, citing the unsustainable influx of 300,000 migrants monthly. He distanced himself from the progressive label, declaring, “I’m just a regular Democrat,” a stark contrast to his 2016 Sanders endorsement.
In 2024, Fetterman’s drift continued. He backed bipartisan border talks, criticized indicted Democratic Senator Bob Menendez, and co-sponsored agriculture-focused bills with Republicans like Mike Braun. His voting record remained largely Democratic, but his rhetoric and willingness to buck party leadership—like calling for Menendez’s expulsion—earned GOP praise. Senators like J.D. Vance commended his “smart” border stance, a far cry from Republican attacks labeling him a “radical socialist” in 2022.
By early 2025, Fetterman’s engagement with Trump cemented his bipartisan turn. He became the first Senate Democrat to meet Trump post-election, praising him as a “singular political talent” and joining Truth Social to advocate for Trump’s pardon over hush-money convictions. He supported some of Trump’s Cabinet picks, including Pam Bondi for Attorney General, and expressed openness to Trump’s controversial Gaza plan, calling it a “provocative” part of the conversation. These moves stunned Democrats, with some, like strategist Christine Jacobs, expressing disappointment over his alignment with a figure he once called a “jagoff.”
Fetterman’s behavior also raised concerns. Reports surfaced in May 2025 of erratic conduct, including an outburst at a teachers’ union meeting and high staff turnover, with former aides citing mental health struggles. His former chief of staff, Adam Jentleson, resigned in 2024, warning doctors of a “bad trajectory.” Fetterman denied these claims, insisting he’s fit to serve, but his absence from committee hearings and limited Pennsylvania appearances fueled speculation. Some Democrats privately discussed replacements, though Fetterman vowed to complete his term, ending in 2029.
His defenders argue Fetterman is adapting to Pennsylvania’s red-leaning shift after Trump’s 2024 victory. Strategist Mustafa Rashed noted, “He’s in a red state,” suggesting his Trump outreach reflects political reality. Others see a deeper change, pointing to his stroke and depression as catalysts for reevaluating priorities. His openness to GOP policies, like energy investments with Senator Dave McCormick, suggests a pragmatic focus on delivering for Pennsylvanians.
Is Fetterman’s shift a heartfelt evolution, driven by personal trials and a commitment to bipartisan results? Or is it a calculated move to secure reelection in a state that’s trending Republican? His voting record remains Democratic, yet his rhetoric and alliances challenge his progressive roots. The answer lies in how you weigh his actions—principled courage or political survival.